Two-state solution

So I was reading the Times today, and happened across this article about the Israelie Palestinian conflict. A two state solution, obviously, means that Israel would give some land back to Palestine, remove its troops from Palestinian territory, ect, ect.
Seriously, fuck that. A two-state solution might look good for the United States, and I'm sure, Palistine, suffering under a one state solution right now would welcome it, but Israel has no good reason to give in to this idiotic demand. It won the land it has now in the 1967 war, a war, I should point out, it didn't start, and should keep that land. If I were israel, I'd finish the job, and obliterate palistine. I mean, every two weeks, some anti-simitic Palestinian throws a rock at an Israely, or bombs some dangerous, culpible target like a sidewalk Cafe or a shopping center, and then Israel launches a rade, the international comunitty bitch's, Palestine cries persicution, and then, in anger, some Palestinian throws a rock, and we start all over again.
Due to the foolishness of Israel's initial land grant by the allied powers, their stuck in an untenible situation. They should crush their enemies, if given any trouble, and we should just shut up about it. Two-state solution. Hey, why don't we give Texas back to Mexico, and we'll give England back to the Irish, and rome should find the people that make up itally, and undo the conquests of the Romen Empire. Oh, yeah, and everyone in Austraila should get the fuck out, go back to England, and give it back to its original population.